Selection Games and Deterministic Lotteries
نویسندگان
چکیده
The design of deterministic and fair mechanisms for selection among a set of self-motivated agents based solely on these agents’ input is a major challenge for electronic commerce. These mechanisms are a special case of zerosum games where the only possible outcomes are selections of a single agent among the set of agents. We assume the lack of an external coordinator, and therefore we focus on mechanisms which have a solution where the agents play weakly dominant strategies. Our first major result shows that dominated strategies could be added to any selection mechanism, so that the resulting mechanism becomes quasi-symmetric. For fairness, we require the mechanism to be non-imposing; that is, the mechanism should allow any agent to be selected in such a solution. We first show that such mechanisms do not exist when there are two or three agents in the system. However, surprisingly, we show that such mechanisms exist when there are four or more agents. Moreover, in our second major result, we show that there exist selection mechanisms that implement any distribution over the agents, when the agents play mixed dominant strategies. These results also have significance for distributed computing, ranking systems, and social choice.
منابع مشابه
Strategyproof Deterministic Lotteries under Broadcast Communication (Short Paper)
The design of deterministic and fair mechanisms for selection among a set of self-motivated agents based solely on these agents’ input is a major challenge in multiagent systems. This challenge is especially difficult when the agents can only communicate via a broadcast channel. We propose the notion of selection games: a special case of zero-sum games where the only possible outcomes are selec...
متن کاملRolling the Dice: Recent Results in Probabilistic Social Choice
When aggregating the preferences of multiple agents into one collective choice, it is easily seen that certain cases call for randomization or other means of tiebreaking. For example, if there are two alternatives, a and b, and two agents such that one prefers a and the other one b, there is no deterministic way of selecting a single alternative without violating one of two basic fairness condi...
متن کاملStress Induces Contextual Blindness in Lotteries and Coordination Games
In this paper, we study how stress affects risk taking in three tasks: individual lotteries, Stag Hunt (coordination) games, and Hawk-Dove (anti-coordination) games. Both control and stressed subjects take more risks in all three tasks when the value of the safe option is decreased and in lotteries when the expected gain is increased. Also, subjects take longer to take decisions when stakes are...
متن کاملOn the design of lottery games
We describe a model of participation in lottery games designed to address the optimisation of tax revenue in state-sponsored lotteries. The model treats participants dynamically and examines a long-run equilibrium. A novel high frequency approximation is used to turn the problem into a static, state-contingent deterministic programming problem. We demonstrate that the solution of this problem h...
متن کاملCooperation in risky environments: Decisions from experience in a stochastic social dilemma
Often in cooperative situations, many aspects of the decisionmaking environment are uncertain. We investigate how cooperation is shaped by the way information about risk is presented (from description or from experience) and by differences in risky environments. Drawing on research from risky choice, we compare choices in stochastic social dilemmas to those in lotteries with equivalent levels o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006